This paper examines the career and legal prosecution of Paul Little (known professionally as Max Hardcore) as a pivotal case study in the regulation of obscenity in the digital age. While the adult entertainment industry largely thrived in the "mainstream" era following the Miller test, Little’s "Max Hardcore" brand occupied an extreme fringe characterized by aggressive physical acts and themes of humiliation. This paper analyzes how his work functioned as a stress test for First Amendment protections, ultimately leading to his conviction on federal obscenity charges in 2008. By exploring the intersection of his production style, the shift in distribution from video stores to the internet, and the Department of Justice's "War on Porn," this study argues that Little’s prosecution represented a symbolic boundary-drawing exercise by the state, defining the limits of acceptable sexual expression in commercial media.
: State if you are seeking newcomers (open call) or seasoned performers. Specific Duties max+hardcore+casting+call+6